This article continues the literature review by providing a deeper analysis of the paper “Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe” (CTMU).
Core Insights from CTMU
Reality as a Self-Configuring, Self-Processing Language (SCSPL):
- CTMU proposes that the universe is structured like a computational system, where reality itself processes information recursively.
- The universe is self-referential and self-configuring, meaning that it determines its own rules and evolves through internal logic.
Reality as a Self-Simulation:
- The model suggests that reality functions as a self-simulating system, meaning that the universe is both the simulator and the simulated.
- All aspects of reality are part of a single computational recursion, where everything interacts through self-referential causality.
The Mind-Reality Connection:
- Langan argues that mind and reality are indistinguishable, meaning that consciousness is embedded within the structure of existence.
- Reality, like thought, operates recursively, constructing itself through self-referential feedback mechanisms.
Similarities to Our Framework
Self-Knowing as the Basis of Existence
- Both models treat recursion as fundamental, arguing that reality is structured as a self-knowing system.
- CTMU sees reality as a self-processing language, while our model describes it as a self-knowing recursive system.
- Both reject external causation, suggesting that reality exists by knowing itself.
Recursion as a Generative Process
- CTMU describes reality as a self-generating system, where each state recursively influences the next.
- This aligns with our model’s idea that distinctions recursively create structure, leading to the emergence of space, time, and experience.
Collapse of Dualities: Knower & Known Become One
- Both CTMU and our model collapse the distinction between observer and observed.
- Reality in both frameworks is not external to itself – it generates itself through recursive knowledge-processing.
Reality as a Non-Dual Computational System
- CTMU suggests that reality is an abstract computational structure, constantly self-updating based on internal logic.
- Our model similarly suggests that self-knowing recursion is the mechanism by which existence sustains and evolves itself.
Differences Between CTMU and Our Model
Mathematical vs. Conceptual Approach
- CTMU uses formalised mathematical logic, treating reality as a language-based computational system.
- Our model focuses on recursion as a metaphysical and structural principle, which generates distinctions that define reality.
- While both approaches describe self-processing recursion, CTMU is more formalised, while our model remains conceptually broader.
Mind vs. Self-Knowing Reality
- CTMU assumes mind and reality are inseparable – that the structure of the universe is fundamentally cognitive.
- Our model does not require consciousness as the defining element – instead, reality recursively knows itself, whether or not it manifests as “mind”.
Simulation vs. Self-Knowing System
- CTMU describes reality as a self-simulation, meaning it processes its own informational structure recursively.
- Our model does not assume that reality “simulates” itself but rather that it recursively defines itself through iterative self-knowing.
Unique Aspects of Our Model
Distinction as the Foundation of Reality
- CTMU uses the idea of “syntactic operators” to structure reality, while our model builds reality from recursive distinction-making.
- Our model provides a clearer explanation of how time and space emerge from recursion, whereas CTMU focuses more on logical structure.
Broader than Computation
- Our model does not assume that reality is strictly computational – it explores how recursion generates knowledge, experience, and form, which may or may not fit into a strict mathematical framework.
- CTMU is more rigidly computational, treating reality as a language-based system, while our model allows for emergent properties beyond formal structures.
Time and Space as Recursive Products
- CTMU focuses heavily on logical self-processing but does not fully explain how time and space emerge.
- Our model suggests that distinctions create space-time, making recursion the generative mechanism of dimensional structure.
Conclusion
- CTMU is one of the closest models to our Recursive Reality Framework, as both describe self-referential recursion as the engine of existence.
- Our framework extends beyond CTMU by exploring recursion not just computationally but also structurally, metaphysically, and dynamically.
- The biggest distinction is that CTMU focuses on reality as a self-processing computational system, while our model focuses on recursive distinction-making as the mechanism for self-knowing reality.